Legal Opinion

Norair Engineering Corp. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided December 2, 1981No. 259-80CPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, Judge

Plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment invokes review under the Wunderlich Act1 of General Services Board of Contract Appeals (board) Decision No. 2975,2 denying plaintiff the greater part of the relief it requested under the changes clause in its contract with defendant General Services Administration.

A

Plaintiff was the prime contractor for the Smithsonian Institution’s Museum of History and Technology (now the National Museum of American History). The construction *162contract is dated September 1, 1959, and plaintiff was expected to complete the building within 900 calendar days. The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. RiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Electronic and Missile Facilities, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
  3. Tombigbee Constructors v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. ACE Constructors, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  2. Fraser Construction Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
  3. Department of Transportation v. Anjo Construction Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. McDevitt & Street Co. v. Marriott Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1989
  5. Fru-Con Construction Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API