Legal Opinion

Sawyer ex rel. Sawyer v. Sawyer

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 12, 1968PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorris, J.

Plaintiffs do not bring forward any exceptions or assignments of error to any finding of fact by the court. The only assignment of error is to the signing and entry of the order setting aside the default judgment. We, therefore, limit ourselves to a determination of whether the facts found and -admitted are sufficient *402to support the judgment. 1 Strong, N. C. Index 2d, Appeal and Error, § 26; Highway Commission v. Reynolds Co., 272 N.C. 618, 159 S.E. 2d 198.

Defendant's motion to set aside was made pursuant to G.S. 1-220. To be entitled to have the judgment set aside, he must show excusable…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State Highway Commission v. LA REYNOLDS COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. Greitzer v. EasthamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  3. King v. SnyderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sawyer Ex Rel. Sawyer v. SawyerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
  2. Mullen v. SawyerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API