Legal Opinion

State v. Pitchford

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 28, 2017No. ED 104283Published

1Opinion of the Court

Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., Judge

Introduction

Perry I. Pitchford, Jr. (Pitchford) appeals from the trial court’s judgment and sentence following a jury’s verdict of guilty. He asserts the trial court plainly erred in admitting excerpts of recorded phone calls Pitchford made in jail that were not disclosed to the defense until the morning of trial, in giving each juror a copy of a specific instruction, in admitting evidence of uncharged and prior bad acts, and in allowing the State to suggest special knowledge of facts during voir dire. We affirm.

Background and Procedure

The State charged Pitchford…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State v. BaumrukSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  2. State v. PrimmSupreme Court of Missouri · 2011
  3. State v. ShockleySupreme Court of Missouri · 2013
  4. State v. FloydMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. State v. BrownMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API