Legal Opinion

Fine v. Parella

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided March 3, 1942No. 3301PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, C. J.

I. A police officer who investigated the accident testified for the plaintiff. In cross-examination he was asked if he had any interest in the case and he replied that he had none. Thereafter the plaintiff’s offer of evidence to confirm the answer of the witness was rejected. The question in its form and substance neither charged nor asserted an interest, and no jury in the exercise of ordinary intelligence would infer an interest from the question. If the answer was disbelieved, yet it remained that there was no “testimony of counsel” from which interest could be found. The question instead…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McCarthy v. SoutherSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1927
  2. Tullgren v. Amoskeag Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1926
  3. Piechuck v. MagusiakSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1926
  4. Carbone v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1937
  5. Woodman v. PeckSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Graham v. WristonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Poulin v. ProvostSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
  3. Allen v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1969
  4. Wilbur v. TourangeauSupreme Court of Vermont · 1950
  5. London v. PerreaultSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API