Legal Opinion · Dissent

Herbert Tepper v. Frank H. Chichester, Trustee in Bankruptcy of the Estate of Bennett-Manning Co., Bankrupt

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 1, 1961No. 16572Published

1DissentPope, Circuit Judge

My inability to concur in the opinion .■stems from my disagreement with the •opinion’s basic holding to the effect that the rights of the appellant are not to be judged by reference to California law •but that in some manner, not spelled out in the opinion, the federal bankruptcy act makes the California law inapplicable.

Thus the opinion states “If bankruptcy ihad not intervened, the appellant might have been entitled to reclaim his prop-erty.” (Here citing California decisions.) Then it proceeds to state that the provisions of the Bankruptcy Act '“are superior to all state laws upon the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Corn Exchange National Bank & Trust Co. v. KlauderSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Thomas v. TaggartSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Holt v. Crucible Steel Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. Elsie B. Allen, George D. Allen v. Matson Navigation Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
  5. In Re McMillan, Rapp & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API