Smith v. Blakesburg Savings Bank
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Davis District Court. — C. W. Vermilion, Judge. Action for damages. Verdict in favor of the defendant King, and against the defendant W. J. Steckel, for $9,361.65. From a judgment rendered against him thereon, defendant Steckel appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtStevens, J.
In his original petition, plaintiff charged the defendants, the Blakesburg Savings Bank, Walter Abegg, Herbert King, and W. J. Steckel, with conspiring together for the purpose of cheating and defrauding him out of his property. During the progress of the trial, plaintiff dismissed his cause of action against the bank and Abegg, and filed an amendment to his petition, alleging that the remaining defendants, by reason of various transactions, had, in furtherance of said conspiracy, and by duress, induced him to convey all of his personal property to Steckel, and the real property to Belle H.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Kwentsky v. SirovySupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
- Schulte v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1901
- Hall v. Incorporated TownSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
- Neibuhr v. GageSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Baldwin v. St. Louis, Keokuk & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1884
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Millsap v. National Funding Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1943
- Gray v. Shell Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1931
- Theus v. Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1990
- Guttenfelder v. IebsenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1937
- Ira S. Bushey & Sons, Inc. v. W. E. Hedger Transp. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.