Ira S. Bushey & Sons, Inc. v. W. E. Hedger Transp. Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1DissentFrank, Circuit Judge
1. This appeal presents, I think, the question whether a court should allow its processes to be employed abusively as coercive weapons. Were the facts as stated by my colleagues, I would agree that that question is not here. But, as I shall try to show, my colleagues reach that conclusion by disregarding what I consider pivotal facts.
While my major disagreement with my colleagues derives from differences about the facts (or their interpretation), I disagree also with several of their legal conclusions. The major items in their opinion with which I disagree are as follows: (a) They recognize…
2Cases cited103 opinions
- United States v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Clyde Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Montgomery Ward & Co. v. DuncanSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States v. MayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.