Legal Opinion

Shell Petroleum Corp. v. Puckett

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 29, 1930No. 3857PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

•■ WILLSON, C.'J.

(after stating the case as above).

Appellant insists-that the right conveyed to appellees “of mining and operating for oil and gas” on the land did not pass to them a right to resort to seismographs as a means of determining whether there was oil or gas thereon or not; and that, owning no right to resort to seismographs, appellees should not have been heard to complain because appellant resorted to them for such a purpose, if it did. We think a right to prospect for oil and gas was incidental to the right conveyed to appellees to mine and operate for same on the land, and are…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ohio Oil Co. v. SharpCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1943
  2. Phillips Petroleum Company and Geophysical Services, Inc. v. Elliott F. CowdenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
  3. Ready v. Texaco, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Yates Et Ux. v. Gulf Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1950
  5. Mustang Production Company v. Texaco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API