Shell Petroleum Corp. v. Puckett
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
•■ WILLSON, C.'J.
(after stating the case as above).
Appellant insists-that the right conveyed to appellees “of mining and operating for oil and gas” on the land did not pass to them a right to resort to seismographs as a means of determining whether there was oil or gas thereon or not; and that, owning no right to resort to seismographs, appellees should not have been heard to complain because appellant resorted to them for such a purpose, if it did. We think a right to prospect for oil and gas was incidental to the right conveyed to appellees to mine and operate for same on the land, and are…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Ohio Oil Co. v. SharpCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1943
- Phillips Petroleum Company and Geophysical Services, Inc. v. Elliott F. CowdenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
- Ready v. Texaco, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1966
- Yates Et Ux. v. Gulf Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1950
- Mustang Production Company v. Texaco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.