United States v. Jarvis Juan
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
M. SMITH, Circuit Judge:
Appellant Jarvis Martin Juan appeals his conviction and sentencing for felony and misdemeanor assault. Juan challenges his conviction on due-process grounds, claiming his constitutional rights were violated where the prosecution “threatened” one of its own witnesses with possible perjury charges, allegedly causing the witness to change her previously exculpatory trial testimony to be inculpatory. Because Juan cannot meet his evidentiary burden, his due-process challenge must be rejected.
Similarly, Juan’s claim of sentencing error fails. Juan’s argument that the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Puckett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. SchefferSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Kelly Park v. Karen ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Venancio Rojas-PedrozaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- People v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
- Ricky Earp v. Ron DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Jennifer FrenchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.