Legal Opinion

Williams v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 7, 1951No. 33212, 33213PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMacIntyre, P. J.

1. “ 'While it is much the better practice to charge concerning the prisoner’s statement in the language of the statute, failure to do so is not cause for a new trial when the substance of the law is correctly stated.’ Pitts v. State, 114 Ga. 35 (3) (39 S. E. 873). It has many times been emphasized that it is much the better practice for trial judges .in charging upon a defendant's statement to confine themselves to the language of the statute. See Ozburn v. State, 87 Ga. 173, 185 (13 S. E. 247); Brundage v. State, 7 Ga. App. 726, 728 (67 S. E. 1051). It is also true that it is error for the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Clifton v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  2. Haden v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
  3. Aycock v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
  4. Ozburn v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
  5. Wright v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
  2. Boatright v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API