Legal Opinion

Ley v. Pilger

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1900No. 9,065PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from the district court of Stanton county. Tried below before Evans, J.

1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.

Adam Pilger and Fred Feyerherm sued Karl Ley in the county court of Stanton county to recover $280, claimed to be due upon a note and account. The summons was issued and served on April 21, and was made returnable on the first day of the following month, which was the first day of the May term. The defendant made no appearance in the action, and on May 2 judgment, was rendered against him by default. He afterwards prosecuted error to the district court, where the judgment of the county court was affirmed. We are of opinion that the judgment of affirmance is right, and that there is no error…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gribbon v. . FreelNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  2. Clough v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
  3. Stilwell v. . SwarthoutNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  4. Granger v. Judge of Superior CourtMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Swerdsfeger v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1879

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Blackman v. MulhallSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Jones v. DanforthNebraska Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Barker Co. v. Central West Investment Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Alden Mercantile Co. v. RandallNebraska Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Oakdale Heat & Light Co. v. SeymourNebraska Supreme Court · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API