Cenntro Electric Group, Limited v. MHP Americas, Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY CENNTRO ELECTRIC GROUP, Civ. No. 24-5747 (GC)(JBD) LIMITED, MEMORANDUM ORDER Plaintiff, v. MHP AMERICAS, INC., Defendant. Before the Court is defendant MHP Americas, Inc.’s (“MHP”) letter motion seeking sanctions against plaintiff Cenntro Electric Group (“Cenntro”) for its failure to comply with a Court Order in respect of a settlement conference in this case. [Dkt. 45.] Cenntro opposes the motion. For the reasons set forth below, MHP’s motion is granted in part and denied in part. The Court will impose sanctions in the amount of $8,976.36…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- International Union, United Mine Workers v. BagwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. HaegerSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
- Tracinda Corp. v. Daimlerchrysler AgCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.