Legal Opinion

Harms v. Freytag

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1899No. 9,051PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from the district court of Nemaha county. Tried below before Stull, J.

1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.

H. J. Harms brought this action in the district court of Nemaha county to recover on a promissory note executed by F. H. Freytag as principal, and by D. Oestman and F. Schlange as sureties. Oestman was not served with summons. Freytag made default, and Schlange answered, alleging that the action was barred by the statute of limitations. The court tried the case without a jury, and found the issue raised by the answer in favor of Schlange. Judgment was rendered on the finding, and the plaintiff, being dissatisfied, brings the record* *360here for review. Whether the trial court reached a correct…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Elder v. DyerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Weir v. BauerUtah Supreme Court · 1930
  2. O'Donnell v. ParkerUtah Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Salt Lake Transfer Co. v. ShurtliffUtah Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Girard Trust Co. v. DixonNebraska Supreme Court · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API