Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Satterfield

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 26, 1952No. 34179PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFelton, J.

The court’s qualification of the jury at the opening of the term did not have the effect of qualifying the jury as to the Georgia Casualty Company in the instant case. The qualification did not mention the Georgia Casualty Company. It mentioned by name several liability insurance companies and referred to “other like” companies. The plaintiff had the right to have the jury qualified as to the Georgia Casualty Company specifically and we feel that a mere reference to “other like” companies did not sufficiently meet the requirement under that right, over the objection of the plaintiff. In view…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Atlanta Coach Co. v. CobbSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  2. Rogers v. McKinleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  3. Tatum v. CroswellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  4. Coleman v. NewsomeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Leggett v. BrewtonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  2. Weatherbee v. HutchesonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  3. Gulick v. MulcahyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
  4. Shepherd Construction Co. v. VaughnCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
  5. Shipman v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API