In Re N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co. v. . M.G.L. Co.
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] The right of eminent domain which sanctions the taking of private property for public use, upon making compensation for the same to the owner thereof, is well settled, and the principal question to be determined in this case is, whether, within this principle, a public necessity is established by the evidence, which authorizes the acquisition by the petitioner of the premises of the appellant. To make out a case within the statute under which this proceeding is…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Rensselaer and Saratoga R.R. Co. v. . DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
- Matter of Boston and Albany R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1873
- White River Turnpike Co. v. Vermont Central Rail RoadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1849
- In re KerrNew York Supreme Court · 1864
3Cited by11 opinions
- St. Paul Union Depot Co. v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
- Illinois Central R. R. v. WathenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1885
- Mobile & Girard Railroad v. Ala. Midland Railway Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1888
- Spring Valley Water Works v. San Mateo Water WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- Douglass v. ByrnesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1893
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.