Caldwell Trucking PRP Group v. Caldwell Trucking Co.
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CAVANAUGH, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court upon a motion by Plaintiffs to remand this matter. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78, no oral argument was heard. This Court has carefully reviewed the submissions of the parties and the' record before it. For the reasons expressed below, it is the finding of this Court that Plaintiffs’ motion to remand is granted.
BACKGROUND
The facts relevant to Plaintiffs’ motion to remand are as follows. On or about April 6, 2000, Plaintiffs filed a motion to amend its complaint against the O’Connor Defendants in the PRP…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Thompson Ex Rel. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Gully v. First Nat. Bank in MeridianSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Feuerzeig v. Innovative Communication Corp.District Court, Virgin Islands · 2001