Legal Opinion

Troutman v. Curtis

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 20, 2008No. 94,667PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Beier, J.:

Plaintiffs Sandra Troutman, Larry Gales, and Gerald Crooks brought this action after they suffered complications arising out of cardiac catheterization procedures. We accepted their petition for review of the Court of Appeals" decision affirming the district court’s summary judgment in favor of defendant Perclose, Inc. (Perclose), the maker of the suturing device used in plaintiffs’ procedures.

After this court heard oral argument in April 2007 in this case, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc., 552…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Gragg v. Wichita State UniversitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1997
  3. Nungesser v. BryantSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  4. Crooks v. GreeneCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1987
  5. Klein v. Oppenheimer & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Northern Natural Gas Co. v. ONEOK Field Services Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  2. Unruh v. PURINA MILLS, LLCSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  3. Adams v. Board of Sedgwick County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  4. Superior Boiler Works, Inc. v. KimballSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
  5. Trear v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API