Legal Opinion
United States v. Manchester Farming Partnership, United States of America v. Lone Pine Land, Inc., United States of America v. Priest Butte Farm, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 10, 2003No. 01-30414, 01-30415, 01-30416PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judge.
Manchester Farming Partnership (“Manchester”), Lone Pine Land, Inc. (“Lone Pine”), and Priest Butte Farm, Inc. (“Priest Butte”), (together, “Appellants”) appeal the district court’s denial of attorney fees and costs pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3006A (the “Hyde Amendment”). Appellants argue that the Government’s conduct before and during the trial was vexatious, frivolous, and in bad faith; thus the district court erred when it denied their Hyde Amendment request for attorney fees and costs. We hold that the district court did not abuse its discretion; therefore,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. GilbertCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Rex G. Endicott, United States of America v. John Stuart RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. SherburneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. David T. BraunsteinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- United States v. Demetrius RamosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- Wizards of the Coast LLC v. Cryptozoic Entertainment LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2015
- United States v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Donald HeavrinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Rodriguez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.