Legal Opinion

Mellaney v. Fordmont Hotel

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1939No. Docket No. 2, Calendar No. 40,253PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

The Fordmont Hotel and its insurer, State Accident Fund, have brought this appeal in the nature of certiorari from an award of compensation made by the department of labor and industry to Stella Mellaney for herself and six children as dependents of Richard Mellaney, deceased.

The Fordmont Hotel, herein designated as defendant, contracted with the Pfefferl Sign Company to paint certain signs on the exterior walls of a hotel building in Detroit. Both the Fordmont Hotel and the Pfefferl Sign Company were Michigan corporations. The former was under the workmen’s compensation act; the latter was…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Gall v. Detroit Journal Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Tuttle v. Embury-Martin Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Ginsberg v. Burroughs Adding Machine Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Zoltowski v. Ternes Coal & Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Perham v. American Roofing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Aquilina v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Prange v. Grand Rapids Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API