Legal Opinion
R. C. Allen Business MacHines, Inc. v. Acres
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided July 29, 1971No. 6145, 6146, 6147PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLampron, J.
Each case involves an action by a foreign corporation to recover for goods sold and delivered to the defendants at their place of business in this State. The defendants appeared specially and filed motions to dismiss on the ground that the plaintiffs had not been licensed to do business in New Hampshire in accordance with the requirements of RSA ch. 300 and introduced certificates of the secretary of state to that effect.
After hearings, die Court ( Grant, J.) granted the motions to dismiss. Plaintiff Puretec, after excepting to the granting of the motion to dismiss, filed a motion for summary…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Automotriz Del Golfo De California v. ResnickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Eli Lilly & Co. v. Sav-On-Drugs, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Furst & Thomas v. BrewsterSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Williams v. WalkerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1948
- Walter E. Heller & Co. of California v. StephensNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Vanco v. Sportsmax, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1983
- Peerless Corp. v. ChinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1972
- Guyette v. C & K Development Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
- Burnham & Co. v. KleinhansSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
- Loenco v. LondonderryDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1996