Legal Opinion

Hammond v. Coleman

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 3, 1877PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to St. Louis Circuit Court. It was necessary that the survey be returned to the recorder of land titles before April 26, 1822, to effect an appropriation of the land. — Brodericlc v. Bagnell, 13 Pet. 436; Bector v. Ashley, 6 Wall. 142; Maclcay v. Bastón, 19 Wall. 619. The certificate of acknowledgment of a sheriff’s deed must be attested by a seal. — Allen v. Bing, 35 Mo. 216; Byan v. Oarr, 46 Mo. 484; Adams v. Buchanan, 49 Mo. 64 ; Harvey v. Bamsey, 49 Mo. 309. The…

Read the full summary

Error to St. Louis Circuit Court. It was necessary that the survey be returned to the recorder of land titles before April 26, 1822, to effect an appropriation of the land. — Brodericlc v. Bagnell, 13 Pet. 436; Bector v. Ashley, 6 Wall. 142; Maclcay v. Bastón, 19 Wall. 619. The certificate of acknowledgment of a sheriff’s deed must be attested by a seal. — Allen v. Bing, 35 Mo. 216; Byan v. Oarr, 46 Mo. 484; Adams v. Buchanan, 49 Mo. 64 ; Harvey v. Bamsey, 49 Mo. 309. The deed of one having no title conveys nothing ; those who come in under a void grant can acquire nothing. — Pollds Lessee v.…

1Opinion of the CourtLewis, P. J.

This is a suit in ejectment, commenced June 13, 1874, for recovery of survey No. 2500, under New Madrid certificate No. 161, located in township 45 of range 1 east, in St. Louis County. Defendants answered, denying generally, and alleging continuous adverse possession, under claim of title, for more than fifty years. The cause was tried before the court sitting as a jury, and judgment was rendered for the defendants.

By an act of Congress, approved June 30, 1864, “ all of the right, title, and interest of the United States in and to ’ ’ *311the land sued for was “ granted, relinquished, and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Gibson v. ChouteauSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Shelby v. GuySupreme Court of the United States · 1826
  3. Nelson v. BrodhackSupreme Court of Missouri · 1869
  4. Jackson Ex Dem. St. John v. ChewSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  5. Gibson v. ChouteauSupreme Court of Missouri · 1867

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hammond v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1887
  2. Hatcher v. HallMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956
  3. Smith v. McCorkleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API