Legal Opinion

Dahline v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1931No. 23270. Department OnePublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBeeler, J.

— On the forenoon of January 11,1930, the respondent Edna Dahline, while alighting from one of appellant’s street cars, at White Center, slipped and fell because of the presence office and compact snow on the step of the car, as alleged by the respondents in their complaint. The appellant denied the charge of negligence that it had permitted ice and snow to accumulate on its car step, and by way of an affirmative defense alleged that whatever injuries Mrs. Dah-line may have sustained were due to her own negligence. These affirmative allegations were denied by the respondents in their reply.

Upo…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Foster v. Seattle Electric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Shannon v. Boston & Albany RailroadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1885
  3. Cross v. Kansas City, Fort Scott & Memphis RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1894
  4. McIlwaine v. Tacoma Railway & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Virginia Railway & Power Co. v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1917

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Oklahoma Ry. Co. v. RoebuckSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API