Legal Opinion

State v. Holt

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 12, 1967No. 52444PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGER, Judge.

Defendant was convicted by a jury of the offense of possessing an “apparatus, device or instrument for the unauthorized use of narcotic drugs,” as proscribed by § 195.020, RSMo 1959, V.A.M.S. (to which revision all statutory references will refer). The Court found that defendant had previously been convicted, sentenced and imprisoned for a felony and sentenced him to imprisonment for a term of five years.

On this appeal, prosecuted by diligent and effective appointed counsel, three points are made, namely: (1) that defendant’s arrest was illegal, that the search which resulted in…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. HolbertSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  2. State v. HeppermanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1942
  3. State v. HefflinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1936
  4. State v. LordSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  5. State v. BeasleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1966

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. State v. CaffeySupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
  2. Pueblo v. Vázquez MéndezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1986
  3. State v. WitherspoonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
  4. State v. FieldsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  5. State v. BrownridgeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API