Legal Opinion

Brown v. Thomas

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided June 14, 1917PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to a judgment of the Circuit Court of Culpeper county, in an action of debt. Judgment for the defendant. Plaintiff assigns error.

1Opinion of the CourtSims, J.

Upon the assignment of error in this case only two questions are presented for our determination, namely:

1. Did the plaintiff have the authority to complete the note sued on by filling up the blanks therein as he did?

2. Were the blanks in the note sued on filled up “within a reasonable time” ?

The rule at common law was that, if, at the time an incomplete instrument was negotiated to a holder for value, the latter was without notice of any limitation upon the authority to complete the instrument, other than was given *768by the incomplete instrument itself, the person who signed the incomplete…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Violett v. PattonSupreme Court of the United States · 1809
  2. Boyd v. McCannCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1856
  3. Hill v. HobartSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1839
  4. Redlich v. . DollNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  5. Madden v. GastonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Republic National Bank of Dallas v. StrealyTexas Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Milam v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Allen v. Rouseville Cooperage Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1931
  4. In Re FerraraNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1931
  5. Republic National Bank of Dallas v. StrealyTexas Supreme Court · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API