Legal Opinion
Edwin Davila v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided July 17, 2001No. 00-3042PublishedCited by 76 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FEIKENS, District Judge.
Edwin Davila appeals a December 15, 1999 district court order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 petition to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. Because Davila voluntarily, intelligently, and knowingly waived his right to collaterally attack his sentence in his plea agreement he may not raise the issue in a § 2255 petition; and thus we affirm the District Court’s judgment.
I. BACKGROUND
Davila is an attorney in Ohio and represented Universal Management Services, Inc. (Universal) as their general counsel. Universal marketed and distributed The Stimulator, a pain…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Town of Newton v. RumerySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Aaron M. Deroo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- George C. Watson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. WilkesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Shawn Jones v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- Ricky Wayne Short v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. PoindexterCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- Larry Slusser v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
- Williams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.