Jensen v. Nall
Supreme Court of Colorado
Error to Earimer District Court. — Hon. Harry P. Gam-1 bre, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bailey
The suit is for the recovery of $425.00 as a commission upon a claimed sale of real estate. The complaint alleges a sale under contract for a specific commission. The answer admits the contract, but denies that the plaintiff procured a purchaser, aided in the sale or performed any service whatever. Upon trial a jury returned a verdict for $200.00, upon which judgment was duly entered. Defendant brings this case here for review on error.
*213There is no controversy concerning the agreement for a specific commission. There was neither allegation nor proof . touching the value of the supposed…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Burns-Moore Mining & Tunnel Co. v. WatsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1909
- Lenander v. GravesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1909
3Cited by8 opinions
- Palmer v. GleasonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1964
- Thompson v. DavisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1947
- Galligan v. LutherSupreme Court of Colorado · 1912
- Reitler v. OlsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1919
- Peterson v. ShafferSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.