Legal Opinion

Jensen v. Nall

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 15, 1912No. 7131PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to Earimer District Court. — Hon. Harry P. Gam-1 bre, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bailey

The suit is for the recovery of $425.00 as a commission upon a claimed sale of real estate. The complaint alleges a sale under contract for a specific commission. The answer admits the contract, but denies that the plaintiff procured a purchaser, aided in the sale or performed any service whatever. Upon trial a jury returned a verdict for $200.00, upon which judgment was duly entered. Defendant brings this case here for review on error.

*213There is no controversy concerning the agreement for a specific commission. There was neither allegation nor proof . touching the value of the supposed…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Burns-Moore Mining & Tunnel Co. v. WatsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1909
  2. Lenander v. GravesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1909

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Palmer v. GleasonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1964
  2. Thompson v. DavisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1947
  3. Galligan v. LutherSupreme Court of Colorado · 1912
  4. Reitler v. OlsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1919
  5. Peterson v. ShafferSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API