Legal Opinion
Marxe v. Marxe
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided April 10, 1989PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
233 N.J. Super. 247 (1989)
558 A.2d 522
IRA MARXE, PLAINTIFF,
v.
RUTH MARXE, DEFENDANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division Family Part, Bergen County.
Decided April 10, 1989.
Gene Schiffman for plaintiff (Schiffman, Berger & Kaufman, attorneys).
Howard Stern for defendant (Stern, Steiger, Croland, Tanenbaum & Schielke, attorneys).
Robert Ritter for Elwood Mabry (Cole, Schotz, Bernstein, Meisel & Forman, attorneys).
KRAFTE, J.S.C.
A pendente lite motion to quash a subpoena duces tecum has been filed by Elwood Mabry, a nonparty, nonresident witness involved in the matrimonial suit between Ira…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wangler v. HarveySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
- Mitchel v. Honorable CropseyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
- United States v. Albert SnyderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Reiman v. BreslinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1980
- In Re Subpoena Duces Tecum Inst. Manage. Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re the Settlement of the Accounts of UnanueNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
- Delmonico v. TraynorDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
- Delmonico v. TraynorDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010