Legal Opinion

Steinle v. Lollis

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 15, 1983No. 21989PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal is from an order of the circuit court affirming the action of the repondent, a magistrate, who had closed a preliminary hearing to members of the press. Closure of the hearing had been granted upon a motion by the defendant (not a party to this appeal) to which there was no objection by the State. Appellants objected to the motion, and thereafter sought writs of mandamus and prohibition from the circuit court. Relief was denied on the ground that members of the press and public have no constitutional right of access to a pretrial proceeding and thus have no basis to challenge…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Nebraska Press Assn. v. StuartSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Gannett Co. v. DePasqualeSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. State v. SinclairSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Byrd v. Irmo High SchoolSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  2. Ex Parte Capital U-Drive-It, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  3. Ex Parte Columbia Newspapers, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  4. Ex Parte First Charleston Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  5. State v. KoonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API