Legal Opinion

Fales v. Mayberry

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Rhode Island

Decided November 15, 1815No. Case No. 4,622PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STOBY, Circuit Justice.

You need not labor the argument. Certainly this action cannot be maintained. The traffic in slaves is a most odious and horrible traffic, contrary to the plainest principles of natural justice and humanity. And it has been very forcibly and correctly observed by a learned judge (Sir W. Grant, — Wheat. Mar. Capt 229), that, abstractedly speaking, it cannot have a legal existence. The laws of the United States, long before the inception of this voyage (Act 22d March, 1794, c. 11 [1 Stat 347]), prohibited, under severe penalties, (including the forfeiture of the vessel)…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Griswold v. WaddingtonNew York Supreme Court · 1819
  2. Allen v. DemingSuperior Court of New Hampshire · 1843
  3. Arsenault v. Realty Funding Corp. (In re Arsenault)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Hampshire · 1995
  4. Bliss v. BrainardSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1860

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API