Fales v. Mayberry
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Rhode Island
1Opinion of the Court
STOBY, Circuit Justice.
You need not labor the argument. Certainly this action cannot be maintained. The traffic in slaves is a most odious and horrible traffic, contrary to the plainest principles of natural justice and humanity. And it has been very forcibly and correctly observed by a learned judge (Sir W. Grant, — Wheat. Mar. Capt 229), that, abstractedly speaking, it cannot have a legal existence. The laws of the United States, long before the inception of this voyage (Act 22d March, 1794, c. 11 [1 Stat 347]), prohibited, under severe penalties, (including the forfeiture of the vessel)…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Griswold v. WaddingtonNew York Supreme Court · 1819
- Allen v. DemingSuperior Court of New Hampshire · 1843
- Arsenault v. Realty Funding Corp. (In re Arsenault)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Hampshire · 1995
- Bliss v. BrainardSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1860