Robert F. Meekins, Jr. v. Roy Wisnoski and Mari Kay Wisnoski

OPINION

MARTHA HILL JAMISON, Justice.

The parties dispute the nature of this lawsuit. Appellant Robert F. Meekins, Jr. characterizes it as a trespass to try title suit, while appellees Roy and Mari Kay Wisnoski contend it is “an impermissible collateral attack on a probate court’s final appealable order related to the partition of ... real property.” In three issues, Mee-kins challenges the trial court’s entry of summary judgment (1) declaring the Wis-noskis own 100% of the surface estate and 50% of the mineral estate of the subject property, (2) ordering Meekins to take nothing, and (3)…