Legal Opinion
United States v. John Doe, a Juvenile
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 20, 2000No. 99-50250PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SILVERMAN, Circuit Judge:
18 U.S.C. § 5033 prescribes the procedure to be followed when a juvenile is arrested by federal law enforcement officers. First, the arresting officers must immediately advise the juvenile of his rights; second, they must immediately advise the juvenile’s parents of the juvenile’s rights; and third, they must bring the juvenile before a magistrate “forthwith.” None of these procedures was followed in this case: The juvenile was not advised of his rights until over three hours after his arrest; the parents were not notified of their child’s rights at all; and the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Haley v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- United States v. FregaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Robert L. Derrick v. R.S. Peterson, Superintendent, Oregon State Correctional InstitutionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- United States v. Rogers Butler, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Ricardo A. BravoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Guzman-PadillaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Juvenile (Rra-A)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Enrique NavaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.