Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Kaplan v. Heinfling

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 17, 1988PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Sandler, J.

This action was originally commenced by Robert Kaplan and Steven Weissman, individually and as members of the partnership known as Kaplan & Weissman, to recover damages on varied grounds arising out of the alleged wrongful termination of the partnership as counsel to Englishtown Sportswear, Ltd. (Englishtown).

The plaintiff Robert Kaplan is the son of Eli Kaplan, who, during the relevant period of time, owned shares in English-town, together with the individual defendants Martin Heinfling and Leo Zelkin, and two others. Eli Kaplan and the two individual…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Guard-Life Corp. v. S. Parker Hardware Manufacturing Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Martin v. . CampNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. In Re the Estate of MontgomeryNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  4. Demov, Morris, Levin & Shein v. GlantzNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Greenberg v. Jerome H. Remick & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Soap Co. v. Ecolab, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  2. Boulevard Associates v. Sovereign Hotels, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  3. Atkins & O'Brien L. L. P. v. ISS International Service System, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  4. Balestriere PLLC v. BanxCorpAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  5. Boulevard Associates v. Sovereign Hotels, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API