Dallas National Bank v. J. H. Davis & Bros.

STAYTOH, Chiee Justice.

—-Appellant caused the property in controversy to be seized under a writ of attachment, as the property of J. L. Hull, in an action instituted against him and others to recover $3560.92, in which a judgment with foreclosure of attachment was subsequently obtained.

Appellees made claim to the property under the statute, and this is a proceeding to try the right of property.

That the cattle in controversy were the property of Hull at the time attachment was levied is not questioned, if appellees had not acquired title thereto. .

Appellant’s attachment was levied on the…