Legal Opinion

United States v. Pierre Fouche

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 15, 1987No. 86-5157PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NELSON, Circuit Judge:

Pierre Fouche appeals his conviction on two counts of unarmed bank robbery, under 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) (1982). He contends that the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress a confession that was allegedly obtained in violation of his Miranda rights. We hold that the government agent’s questions were fairly designed to clarify Fouche’s equivocal request for counsel and that Fouche made a knowing and voluntary waiver of his Miranda rights. Since Fouche has made no claim that the confession was otherwise involuntary, we conclude that the confession was properly…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  5. Smith v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Holland v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1991
  2. 42 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 527, 95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 8949 United States of America v. John Jario Gil, United States of America v. Daniel MontoyaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  3. United States v. Leonardo Mendoza-Cecelia, Terry Lee Greenberg, Hector Favio Marin-HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
  4. United States v. OgbuehiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  5. State v. KygerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1989

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API