Legal Opinion · Concurrence
Brantley v. Glover
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
Decided August 12, 2011No. 2100378Published
1ConcurrenceBryan, Judge
The main opinion states:
“[I]n order to trigger the mandatory requirement for the trial court to consider the Kirtland [ v. Fort Morgan Authority Sewer Service, Inc., 524 So.2d 600 (Ala.1988),] factors, a party filing a motion to set aside the default judgment must allege and provide arguments and evidence regarding all three of the Kirtland factors. See Carroll v. Williams, 6 So.3d 463, 468 (Ala.2008)....”
84 So.3d at 81. I do not read Carroll v. Williams, 6 So.3d 463 (Ala.2008), as establishing a bright-line rule stating that a trial court need not consider a motion to set aside a default…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kirtland v. Fort Morgan Auth. Sewer Serv., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
- Carroll v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008
- Fries Correctional Equip., Inc. v. Con-Tech, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990
- B. E. H. v. State Ex Rel. M.E.C.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2011
- Aldridge v. HamiltonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.