Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Brantley v. Glover

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided August 12, 2011No. 2100378Published

1ConcurrenceBryan, Judge

The main opinion states:

“[I]n order to trigger the mandatory requirement for the trial court to consider the Kirtland [ v. Fort Morgan Authority Sewer Service, Inc., 524 So.2d 600 (Ala.1988),] factors, a party filing a motion to set aside the default judgment must allege and provide arguments and evidence regarding all three of the Kirtland factors. See Carroll v. Williams, 6 So.3d 463, 468 (Ala.2008)....”

84 So.3d at 81. I do not read Carroll v. Williams, 6 So.3d 463 (Ala.2008), as establishing a bright-line rule stating that a trial court need not consider a motion to set aside a default…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kirtland v. Fort Morgan Auth. Sewer Serv., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  2. Carroll v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008
  3. Fries Correctional Equip., Inc. v. Con-Tech, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  4. B. E. H. v. State Ex Rel. M.E.C.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2011
  5. Aldridge v. HamiltonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API