Legal Opinion
DiVecchio v. Gimbel Bros.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 13, 1966No. Civ. A. No. 64-282PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JOHN L. MILLER, District Judge.
Plaintiff filed this action to recover-from the original defendant, Gimbel1. Brothers, Inc., damages for injuries resulting from the improper functioning-of a bicycle purchased from Gimbels.. Plaintiffs alleged both negligence and! breach of warranties. Jurisdiction is-, based on diversity of citizenship and.. Pennsylvania law governs.
Upon motion of the original defendant, the Court entered an order directing-that Kynast Company, the West German-corporation which manufactured the-bicycle, be joined as a third party defendant. That joinder was never…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Orange Theatre Corp. v. Rayherstz Amusement Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944
- Canvas Fabricators, Inc. v. William E. Hooper & Sons Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1952
- Shirley M. Russell v. New Amsterdam Casualty Company and Consumers Public Power DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964
- Anderson v. Taylorcraft, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1961
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Zelson v. ThomfordeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
- Crouch v. CrouchSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
- In Re the Marriage of BradfordMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
- Ruddies v. Auburn Spark Plug Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1966
- Zelson v. ThomfordeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.