Legal Opinion

Erigan v. Sirtex Oil Industries, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 2, 1965No. 4406PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILSON, Justice.

Whether a surface lease terminated by nonpayment of rental is the question in this case. The trial court granted appellee’s motion for instructed verdict, and rendered a declaratory judgment that it had not terminated. Lessor appeals.

The surface lease contract recited existence of an oil and gas lease, not in evidence, which described the same property. The surface lease provided:

“The term of this lease shall run concurrently and be coextensive with the life of said oil and gas mining lease, and this surface lease shall be deemed to have terminated when such oil and gas lease…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jones v. GibbsTexas Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Willeke v. BaileyTexas Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Leeland Properties Co. v. VaughanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sirtex Oil Industries, Inc. v. EriganTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Sirtex Oil Industries, Inc. v. EriganTexas Supreme Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API