Legal Opinion

Rowland v. Rowland

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 18, 1948No. 16330PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Atkinson, Presiding Justice.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) The petition sought a receivership for the purpose of liquidating the partnership of D. H. Rowland Lumber Mills. It alleged that D. H. Rowland, who is not a party to this suit, was a member of this firm. Without dealing with the question of the lack of allegations as to insolvency or waste on the part of the partnership, suffice it to say that, in so far as the petition sought a receivership for the partnership, there was a nonjoinder of parties defendant and the petition was subject to the special demurrers directed thereto.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Arteaga v. ArteagaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
  2. Morgan v. WoodsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1882
  3. Sutton v. AdamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  4. Robinson v. Georgia Savings Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  5. Hawes v. GlovesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Robinson v. BoydSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
  2. Marion v. ChandlerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Anderson v. BruceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  4. Salter v. SalterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
  5. Pike v. ArmburstCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API