Salter v. Salter
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Wyatt, Justice.
The plaintiffs in error first contend that their demurrer should have been sustained because there was a misjoinder of causes of action. It is contended that the joining of allegations and prayers seeking to have a purported spendthrift trust declared null and void, and allegations seeking an accounting and seeking an injunction prohibiting the disposal of the estate pending this action, in a single count, is multifarious ' and duplicitous. The instant petition is not subject to either of these criticisms. Multifariousness has been defined to be “The improperly joining in one…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Teasley v. BradleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Grant v. HartSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
- Citizens & Southern National Bank v. EllisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
- Clark v. ClarkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
- Eagan v. ConwaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Evans v. LittleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
- Jacob v. DavisCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- Salter v. SalterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
- Raak v. RaakMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
- First National Bank of Arizona v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.