Legal Opinion

Salter v. Salter

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 16, 1952No. 17809PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wyatt, Justice.

The plaintiffs in error first contend that their demurrer should have been sustained because there was a misjoinder of causes of action. It is contended that the joining of allegations and prayers seeking to have a purported spendthrift trust declared null and void, and allegations seeking an accounting and seeking an injunction prohibiting the disposal of the estate pending this action, in a single count, is multifarious ' and duplicitous. The instant petition is not subject to either of these criticisms. Multifariousness has been defined to be “The improperly joining in one…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Teasley v. BradleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  2. Grant v. HartSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  3. Citizens & Southern National Bank v. EllisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
  4. Clark v. ClarkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
  5. Eagan v. ConwaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1902

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Evans v. LittleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  2. Jacob v. DavisCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  3. Salter v. SalterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
  4. Raak v. RaakMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. First National Bank of Arizona v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API