Legal Opinion

Young v. Young

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided June 30, 1922No. 43PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rodney, J.:

The second reason may easily be disposed of since it is nowhere suggested that the service of the rule was accepted by the attorney for the defendant and no questions are involved as to his authority other than those growing out of his relation or status as attorney of record for the defendant in the divorce cause.

*27It is, however, suggested that since no request for allowance from the property of the husband was made in the original petition for divorce, such request after a decree nisi is entered became a separate proceeding and that the respondent is not in court either by virtue…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jones v. JonesSuperior Court of Delaware · 1916
  2. Pleasanton v. PleasantonSuperior Court of Delaware · 1919
  3. Taylor v. WarringtonSuperior Court of Delaware · 1916

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Guyer v. Haveg CorporationSuperior Court of Delaware · 1964
  2. Townsend v. TownsendSuperior Court of Delaware · 1933
  3. Husband v. WifeSupreme Court of Delaware · 1969
  4. Wife v. HusbandSuperior Court of Delaware · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API