Legal Opinion
Guyer v. Haveg Corporation
Superior Court of Delaware
Decided November 30, 1964No. 1479PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHRISTIE, Judge.
Plaintiff, Hubert A. Guyer, trading as Hubert A. Guyer Company, contends that defendants, Haveg Corporation and Haveg Industries, Inc., (collectively referred to herein as Haveg) entered into five different oral contracts with plaintiff. Under the terms of each alleged contract, Guyer was to carry out certain machine processes on missile components for Haveg. By the terms of each alleged contract Haveg granted plaintiff the exclusive right to supply all Haveg’s needs for such work until Haveg no longer had any such requirements.
Plaintiff further contends that Haveg breached…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Cohen v. Bartgis Bros.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
- Cohen v. Bartgis Brothers CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
- Bernard J. Lee, Platiff-Appellant v. Jenkins Brothers, Bernard J. Lee v. Farnham YardleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- Burkle v. Superflow Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Moore v. MooreSupreme Court of Delaware · 1958
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Haveg Corporation v. GuyerSupreme Court of Delaware · 1965
- Alumax Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1997
- Molasky Enterprises, Inc. v. Carps, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1981
- Susan R. Lindsey v. M.A. Zeccola & Sons, Incorporated, a Delaware Corporation M.A. ZeccolaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Judge v. RagoSupreme Court of Delaware · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.