Legal Opinion

Montgomery v. Clem

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 5, 1926PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBland, J.

This is an action for damages for fraud and deceit. At the close of plaintiffs’ testimony the court sustained defendant’s demurrer to the evidence, resulting in a verdict and judgment in favor of defendant. Plaintiffs have appealed.

The petition alleges that plaintiffs, on the 20th day of May, 1920, were the owners of certain real estate in the City of Trenton; that d'efendant—

1'. . . being desirous of securing for himsel f the above-described, property of the plaintiffs, and knowing that plaintiffs were desirous of exchanging their property for one more suitable to their needs, offered to…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Dezell v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1903
  2. Clark v. . DillonNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  3. Snyder v. FreeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  4. Young v. SchofieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
  5. Long v. LongSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bakewell v. Missouri State Employees' Retirement SystemMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Pierce v. New York R. Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1953
  3. James v. Kansas City Gas Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API