Legal Opinion

James v. Kansas City Gas Co.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided July 9, 1930PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRagland, J.

This is an action by plaintiff to recover damages for the death of her husband, caused, she alleges, by the negligence of the Bailey-Reynolds Chandelier Company and the Kansas City Gas Company. She brought her action against them jointly and recovered as against both a judgment for $10,000. Each of the defendants prosecuted a separate appeal: their appeals were consolidated here and heard as one cause. ¥e adopt respondent’s statement of the issues and facts, in part, as follows:

“On the 2d day of February, 1924, Claude O. James (plaintiff’s husband) . . . was walking along the sidewalk on the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dezell v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1903
  2. O'Leary v. Scullin Steel CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1924
  3. Mallinckrodt Chemical Works v. NemnichSupreme Court of Missouri · 1902
  4. Riggs v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  5. Long v. LongSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Faught Ex Rel. Faught v. WashamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  2. State v. GregorySupreme Court of Missouri · 1936
  3. Stephens v. Kansas City Gas CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1946
  4. McDonald Ex Rel. Baber v. Kansas City Gas Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  5. Lynch v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API