Legal Opinion
Klem v. First National Bank of Chicago
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided October 2, 1995No. 2-95-0019PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Geiger
The plaintiff, Gary Klem, appeals from the trial court’s order dismissing his complaint pursuant to section 2—615 of the Code of Civil Procedure (735 ILCS 5/2—615 (West 1994)), on the grounds that it was barred by the Credit Agreements Act (the Act) (815 ILCS 160/0.01 et seq. (West 1994)). For the reasons that follow, we affirm.
The facts of the case, as alleged in the plaintiff’s complaint, are as follows. The plaintiff had been employed by defendant GaryWheaton Bank (the Bank) since 1973. At the time of the plaintiff’s resignation in 1991, he held the title of "Vice-President/Manager-Product…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kraft, Inc. v. EdgarIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
- FIRST NAT. BANK IN STAUNTON v. McBride Chevrolet, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1994
- Whirlpool Financial Corp. v. SevauxDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1994
3Cited by19 opinions
- R & B Kapital Development, LLC v. North Shore Community Bank & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2005
- Bank One, Springfield v. RoscettiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
- Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Lois/USA, Inc. v. Conseco Finance Servicing Corp. (In Re Lois/USA, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Whirlpool Financial Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Jean SevauxCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Mika v. Central Bank of Kansas CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.