Legal Opinion

Meidinger v. Commissioner

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided March 7, 2014No. 13-1288PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JUDGMENT

2Per curiam

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States Tax Court; the briefs and appendices filed by the parties; appellant’s Rule 28(j) letter; and the motion to expedite, opposition thereto, and reply. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Tax Court’s Order and Decision served August 30, 2013, be affirmed. The Tax Court correctly concluded that because the information appellant provided did not result in “initiation of an administrative or judicial action” or “collection of tax proceeds,” Cooper v. Comm’r, 136 T.C. 597, 600…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cooper v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2011
  2. Cohen v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
  3. Anonymous v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2010
  4. Simmons v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Richard E. Lacey, II v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2019
  2. Meidinger v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
  3. Patrick Kennedy v. Cmsnr. IRS & Roy Meidinger, Sr. v. IRSCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API