Legal Opinion

Carlton Hotel, Inc. v. Abrams

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 2, 1948PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLummus, J.

This is a bill in equity under G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 231 A, which was inserted in our statutes by St. 1945, c. 582, § 1. The bill alleges that the plaintiff retained, the defendant Abrams as an attorney at law, that said, defendant has performed various legal services as such, that said defendant has procured from the plaintiff more than $13,000, which is in excess of the value of his services, and that said defendant threatens to bring an action to recover $25,000 more for legal services. The bill further *202alleges that the defendant Buckminster Operating Corp. has agreed with the defendant…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. School Committee of Cambridge v. Superintendent of SchoolsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  4. Hogan v. HoganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
  5. Merchants Mutual Casualty Co. v. LeoneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Ciszewski v. Industrial Accident BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  2. Johnson Products, Inc. v. City Council of MedfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968
  3. Sydney v. Commissioner of Corporations & TaxationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  4. Povey v. School Committee of MedfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1955
  5. City of New Bedford v. New Bedford, Woods Hole & Steamship AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API