Povey v. School Committee of Medford
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtQua, C.J.
This case comes to us by appeal after the sustaining of demurrers and a decree dismissing the bill.
The material allegations of the bill are that the fifteen plaintiffs are residents and taxpayers in Medford, that the defendant Murphy is purporting to act as principal of the Hillside and Hervey schools; that the other defendants, except the city of Medford, are the members of the school committee; that the superintendent in accordance with his duty under rules of the committee recommended one Innis to be principal of these two schools, but that a majority of the committee voted to appoint…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- School Committee of Cambridge v. Superintendent of SchoolsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- Dealtry v. Selectmen of WatertownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
- Kelley v. School Committee of WatertownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953
- Kilroy v. O'ConnorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
- Burnes v. Metropolitan District CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Charbonnier v. AmicoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Bettigole v. Assessors of SpringfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
- Gordon v. FollowellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
- City of Boston v. Massachusetts Port AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
- Woods v. City of NewtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.