Legal Opinion

Bundy v. Dodson

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1867PublishedCited by 6 opinions

APPEAL from the Boone Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtGregory, J.

— Bundy sued Dodson for enticing away his minor son. The complaint avers that the plaintiff' is the father of, and entitled to the services of Thomas N. Bundy; that the defendant on, &e., enticed away the said Thomas, against the consent of the plaintiff, hired and put him into the army of the United States as a substitute for the defendant, for tbe term of one yeai’, without the knowledge or consent of the plaintiff; that the defendant well knew that the said Thomas was a minor, under the age of 21 years; that at the time of the hiring, substitutes for one year in the army were worth $800,…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Fort Wayne, Cincinnati & Louisville Railway Co. v. BeyerleIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Cole v. SearfossIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
  3. Gapen v. GapenWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Kreag v. AnthusIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
  5. Potter v. DavidsonOregon Supreme Court · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API