National Labor Relations Board v. Arthur Sarnow Candy Co., Inc. And Lily Popcorn, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SEYBERT, District Judge:
OVERVIEW
On August 21, 1992, Local 719, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, AFL-CIO (“the Union”) was elected as the representative of certain employees of Arthur Sarnow Candy Co., Inc. and Lily Popcorn, Inc. (together, “the Company"’), 1 despite attempts by the Company to block the election. On September 25, 1992, the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB” or “Board”) certified the Union as the employees’ representative over the Company’s objections. The Company then refused to bargain with the Union. On September 30,1993, the Board found that the refusal to…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Burns International Security Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Woelke & Romero Framing, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- National Labor Relations Board v. Mattison MacHine WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- National Labor Relations Board v. Sumter Plywood CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Polymers, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- United States v. BrowneCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
- Snell Island SNF LLC v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- National Labor Relations Board, and Local 1199, Drug, Hospital and Health Care Employees Union, Intervenor v. Rock Bottom Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- National Labor Relations Board v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union 16, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- Terrace Gardens Plaza, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.