Legal Opinion

Clements v. Donohue

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 21, 1964No. Civ. No. 10863PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtPierce, P. J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment following a defense verdict in a personal injury action. The ear in wMch plaintiff was riding was hit by defendant* who had “run a stop sign” in violation of Vehicle Code section 22450, *418which requires the driver of a vehicle approaching an intersection posted with a stop sign to stop. The only question on appeal is whether defendant produced evidence sufficient to justify the jury’s implied finding that violation of the statute was excused. We have decided that he did.

The accident happened at the intersection of Madison and Manzanita Avenues in Sacramento…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Alarid v. VanierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Nevis v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Graf v. GarciaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  4. Baxter v. RogersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Schauf v. Southern California Edison Co.California Court of Appeal · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API